In 2019 Johnny Depp sued Amber Heard for US$ 50 million, accusing her of defaming him by saying that he hit her when they were married, and especially for an article the actress wrote in 2018 and was published in Washington Post, where she narrated her experience as a survivor of domestic abuse. The trial is currently taking place, and new lurid details of the couple continue to be revealed, but something that has attracted attention is that a makeup brand has denied Amber Heard and their lawyers.
According to a story already known for several years, the actress would have covered the bruises caused by her ex-husband’s blows with makeup, and Heard’s defense (The Danish Girl (69%), London Fields (0%), The Booth (80%)) cited the name and brand, “All In One Correcting Kit”, by Milani. In accordance with Daily Maillawyer Benjamin Rottenborn He assured that the actress carried her makeup in her bag at all times, to cover the bruises and that no one saw them in public. On April 12, during the opening statement, the attorney showed the makeup and stated:
She became adept at this. You will hear Amber’s testimony on how she had to mix the different colors for the different days of the bruises as they developed into the different colors, and how she would use [esto] to retouch them to be able to cover them.
However, Milani Cosmetics has responded in a video that the make-up cited by the actress’s defense was not launched on the market until 2017, while the alleged cases of violence would have taken place between 2013 and 2016. In the clip, an employee of the company pointed to a Power Point presentation of the products, and we can see that the Correcting Kit was sold until 2017.
However, a friend of Heard defended the lawyers saying the following:
Ms. Heard’s attorney was using an example of the kind of makeup she wore, but it’s a sad day when a makeup company uses that as an opportunity to downplay what domestic violence victims have to do to hide the results of the abuse.
According to Daily Mailseveral users supported the company for raising their voices on the subject, but there were also many who criticized the opportunism of the situation to advertise, as the medium Jezebelwho wrote: “Milani used the moment as a publicity opportunity.”
Heard’s original accusations against Depp Scissorhands (91%)) date back to 2016, but after that the actor continued to appear in successful projects like Pirates of the Caribbean: Salazar’s Revenge (30%) Y Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald (48%); things got tough when the #MeToo movement gave way to the cancellation of movie stars like kevin spacey, T. J. Miller Y James Franco, among others, and Warner Bros. received criticism for having the actor in the Fantastic Beasts franchise. As for Disney, it was announced in 2018 that the Pirates of the Caribbean saga would have a reboot without Depp, and that infuriated him, since it was his highest-paid role.
In 2020 there was already a trial of the actor against the British newspaper The Sunwho called him a “wife beater,” but lost it, and was fired from Fantastic Beasts: Dumbledore’s Secrets (50%). If he loses in this new trial, being fired from a movie should no longer be a reason for Depp to fear, but instead he will have to face the counter-suit of Amber Heard for US$100 million against him. There is a lot at stake, and the public is attentive to what will happen.
YOU MAY ALSO BE INTERESTED | ON VIDEO
We would love to thank the writer of this article for this outstanding web content
Amber Heard and her lawyers are accused of lying by cosmetic brand
Check out our social media accounts as well as other pages related to themhttps://celebritynews.fuzzyskunk.com/related-pages/