the judgment of Johnny Depp Y Amber Heard It has paralyzed the fans of both, but also the Hollywood community before the evolution of accusations and opposing testimonies that reflect daily two sides with completely opposite experiences and experiences in the relationship. However, on the day of last Thursday, May 19, a statement was made that could twist the actor’s judgment.
And I’m not talking about the deposition of Ellen Barkin talking about the alleged events of violence that she experienced as Depp’s girlfriend in 1998, but about the testimony of the former agent of the Pirates of the Caribbean actor.
Depp sued his ex-wife for defamation over an article he published on Washington Post in 2018, explaining her experience as an alleged victim of gender-based violence. Amber Heard does not name Johnny Depp at any time, but the restraining order that she filed against him led to the final media accusation. At the time of declaring, the actor of Edward Scissorhands said “lost nothing less than everything” as a result of the article, stating that he was the real victim of abuse in the relationship.
It is true that since 2018 Depp has not participated in the type of blockbusters that he used to star in and that, since he lost the British trial against the tabloid The Sun for calling it “wife beater”, his career was plummeting. He not only gave up the role of Grindelwald in the Harry Potter prequel saga, fantastic animals, at the request of Warner Bros., but his latest films were quietly passing through the billboard (as was The Minamata Photographer) while not shooting a feature film since 2019. Even Disney would have reconsidered the future of Pirates of the Caribbean. According to producer Jerry Bruckheimer a few days ago, the actor will not return “right now” to the saga. “The future is yet to be decided.” sentenced to TheTimes, perhaps referring to the fate that may mark the verdict of the trial.
For her part, Amber Heard accuses him of domestic violence and sexual abuse, while both have been bringing to light audios, videos and photographs that show us a toxic relationship, where drugs, alcohol and manipulation would have played an important role. The two have tried to explain every image and audio that leaves them in a sticky situation, both Depp insulting her ex and her apparently denigrating him on recording. However, on Thursday, May 19, Amber Heard’s defense presented several statements recorded in recent months. And one of them made me analyze if she couldn’t twist the jury.
I mean the agent Tracey Jacobs who represented Johnny Depp for 30 years through the United Talent agency until she was fired in 2016.
GUIDE | The steps you have to follow to be able to watch a YouTube video that is not available due to your privacy preferences
To begin with, we must bear in mind that it is a relevant figure in his career, who worked by his side from practically his first successes until the beginning of the scandal that now surrounds him. In other words, he was part of the hiring and negotiation process for Pirates of the Caribbean, Fantastic Beasts and many more blockbusters. He witnessed firsthand the actor’s rise to the top of the big stars.
Jacobs testified that for the last 10 years he was representing him, “It got more complicated.” do their job because of the “unprofessional behavior” of the actor. He said that Depp was late for filming “consistently” in “virtually every movie, while questions circulated in the industry about his attitudeleading to the development of a supposed reputation that would have made it very difficult to get him new jobs.
“I never told him ‘you are a difficult customer’. I never used those words, but I was very honest with him and said ‘you need to stop doing this, it’s hurting you. So it was”.
“At first the shoots loved him” said. “He was always wonderful with the team. But the technical teams don’t like to sit around for hours and hours waiting for the star to show up.” He added that word spread in the city because “people talk and it is a small community”, deriving according to Jacobs in that “people will be reluctant to use it [para sus películas] To the end”.
She also said that Depp sometimes yelled at her, defining that at the time of firing her in October 2016, the actor “I was no longer the biggest star in the world.” as it had been by his side long ago. “His star went out because it was more difficult to get him a job. Jabbs said. “People talked. The question about her behavior was in the air” He sentenced while confirming that the rumor was also related to the consumption of alcohol and drugs. In addition, he added that Depp’s image was also affected by the demands he presents. “They don’t help. They are infinite” detailed.
In turn, the defense of Amber Heard also called to declare Joel Mandel, Depp’s former business manager, whom he also fired in 2016 after running his business from practically the beginning of his career. The lawyer explained that the actor began to have financial problems in 2015, urging him to cut expenses. But a year later Depp fired him and then sued him. Mandel’s company responded with another lawsuit explaining that Depp was responsible for his financial problems. They finally reached an agreement in 2018.
However, the testimony of Jacobs and Mandel paints a picture where Depp would have stopped entering the exorbitant figures of other times, with more difficulty in getting him new roles, as explained by the former agent as a result of the alleged bad reputation that would have been generated in Hollywood. Jacobs even reported that the actor even asked his company for a $20 million loan without explaining why he needed it, but they refused because “They are not a bank.
Finally, testimony from Disney executive producer Tina Newman was also included. To put ourselves in context, let us remember that Johnny Depp exposes in the lawsuit that Disney fired him from the sixth installment of Pirates of the Caribbean as a result of the article published by Amber Heard describing himself as “a public figure representing domestic abuse”. Even his manager, Jack Wigham, testified at trial that there was a waived agreement with the studio for Depp to make the sequel at his usual salary of $22.5 million. However, Tina Newman explained that she was not aware of anyone at Disney saying anything about Depp not appearing in the film as a result of the article.
With all this, where is the lawsuit for defamation? Because, as much as Depp and Heard are revealing the worst versions of the relationship, accusing each other of jealousy, abuse, manipulation and violence, in the end the jury must decide whether or not Heard defamed Depp with his article, resulting in the loss of jobs and their privileged position in Hollywood.
However, the fact that his 30-year-old former agent explained that, in his experience, it was difficult to get his client a job at the last stage at his side because of the reputation he had built himself, could make reaching a conclusion more difficult. . How then could the jury see it? Did he lose his status because of the Amber Heard article published in 2018 or was he losing his place from a few years before?
Because if we believe the version of his agent and business consultant, we would have an actor who rose to the top, but between the alleged bad reputation for being late to filming, the extravagant expenses and lack of income that were at the height, he could have lost the privileged position he had. Jacobs sowed the doubt and now it will be necessary to see what decision the jury reaches when they begin to deliberate on May 27.
More stories that may interest you:
We want to say thanks to the writer of this short article for this outstanding material
Johnny Depp’s ex-agent twists the trial with an unexpected statement
Visit our social media accounts as well as other pages related to themhttps://celebritynews.fuzzyskunk.com/related-pages/